Presentation+Rubric

Punctuation Presentation Rubric- Mr. Garlick's Academic English 8 Score: Period: Group Members:


 * = Category ||= 4 ||= 3 ||= 2 ||= 1 ||
 * < Content ||< Demonstrates full understanding of the topic. ||< Demonstrates some understanding of the topic. ||< Demonstrates some understanding, but is clearly lacking sufficient understanding. ||< Student obviously does not understand the topic. ||
 * Collaboration || The group worked together effectively, and everyone had an equal part. || The group worked together well, but not all parts were entirely equal. || The group worked together, but one group member was clearly given an unequal role. || The group collaborated poorly, as one person presented all material. ||
 * < Focus ||< Students stay completely on topic with relevant information. ||< Students stay mostly on topic, but some irrelevant information is presented. ||< Students present the topic, but use irrelevant information for the bulk of the presentation. ||< Presentation information is irrelevant to the topic presented. ||
 * < Vocabulary ||< Uses vocabulary appropriate to the topic. Extends words by providing definitions and examples that the audience may not understand. ||< Uses vocabulary appropriate to the topic. Uses 1-2 words that may be new to audience, but does not define them. ||< Uses vocabulary appropriate to the topic. Does not include any new vocabulary, or uses 2-4 new words without defining them. ||< Vocabulary does not connect with audience (5 or more new words presented without definition). ||
 * < Clarity ||< Students speak clearly the entire presentation. ||< Students speak clearly for the majority of the presentation. ||< Students speak clearly about half the time. ||< Students are mostly incomprehensible. ||
 * < Volume ||< Students speak at an appropriate volume the entire presentation. ||< Students speak at an appropriate volume for most of the presentation. ||< Students speak at an appropriate volume for about half of the presentation. ||< Students do not use appropriate volume for the majority of the presentation. ||
 * < Effectiveness ||< Students showed enthusiasm, body language, and facial expression to generate interest in the topic from the audience. ||< Students somtimes used enthusiasm, body language, and facial expression to generate interest in the topic from the audience. ||< Students minimally used enthusiasm, body language, and facial expression to generate interest in the topic from the audience. ||< Students did not use enthusiasm, body language, and facial expression to generate interest in the topic from the audience. ||
 * < Technology Usage ||< Students thoughougly integrated technology into the presentation ||< Students used the technology for the majority of their presentation. ||< Students used the technology to a minimal degree during their presentation. ||< Students did not use the technology during their presentation. ||
 * Audience Interaction || Group interacted with the audience through questions, activities, etc. Use of a handout/extraneous visual aid assisted in reception of presentation. || Group interacted with the audience through question and answer techniques, but did so to an extent that kept the audience engaged. || Group intereacted with the audience only minimally, making some attempt to promote learner engagement. || Group made no attempt to interact with the audience beyond the presentation itself. ||